U.N. Inspectors Dispute Iran Report By House Panel
Paper on Nuclear Aims Called DishonestBy Dafna Linzer
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, September 14, 2006; A17U.N. inspectors investigating Iran's nuclear program angrily complained to the Bush administration and to a Republican congressman yesterday about a recent House committee report on Iran's capabilities, calling parts of the document "outrageous and dishonest" and offering evidence to refute its central claims.
Officials of the United Nations' International Atomic Energy Agency said in a letter that the report contained some "erroneous, misleading and unsubstantiated statements." The letter, signed by a senior director at the agency, was addressed to Rep. Peter Hoekstra (R-Mich.), chairman of the House intelligence committee, which issued the report. A copy was hand-delivered to Gregory L. Schulte, the U.S. ambassador to the IAEA in Vienna.
The IAEA openly clashed with the Bush administration on pre-war assessments of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Relations all but collapsed when the agency revealed that the White House had based some allegations about an Iraqi nuclear program on forged documents.
After no such weapons were found in Iraq, the IAEA came under additional criticism for taking a cautious approach on Iran, which the White House says is trying to build nuclear weapons in secret. At one point, the administration orchestrated a campaign to remove the IAEA's director general, Mohamed ElBaradei. It failed, and he won the Nobel Peace Prize last year.
Yesterday's letter, a copy of which was provided to The Washington Post, was the first time the IAEA has publicly disputed U.S. allegations about its Iran investigation. The agency noted five major errors in the committee's 29-page report, which said Iran's nuclear capabilities are more advanced than either the IAEA or U.S. intelligence has shown.
Thursday, September 14, 2006
Is it just me?
or isn't this how we got to Iraq? This is something, perhaps, to pay some careful attention to, if we find ourselves presented with "evidence" of an imminent threat from Iran. The first step toward being a full particpant in deliberative democracy is acquiring enough knowledge to judge for yourself the claims made by those with political (and economic) power. From the Washington Post
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment